Find out more at: http://13.re-publica.de/node/5337
What is a critical idea of “open” and what might radical digital humanities be? In memoriam Aaron Schwartz.
Digitization has opened the ivory tower of academic publishing and research to everyone – by now Open Access and Open Data are acknowledge by the EU while Digital Humanities have become a buzzword to win a research funding. So far the struggle has been easy: we considered “open” and “digital” as good, while “closed” was bad.
Now things are getting complicated. Not only that several commercial publishers have started successful Open Access journals. The digitization of the Humanities seem to push our universities according to neoliberal demands: pragmatic and project oriented, not critical and independent. What critical potential has digitization to offer? Can it really change our knowledge l…
Mercedes Bunz | http://mercedesbunz.net | http://twitter.com/mrsbunz
Nishant Shah | http://twitter.com/Latelyontime
David Berry | http://www.swan.ac.uk/staff/academic/artshumanities/berryd/ | http://twitter.com/berrydm
Cornelius Puschmann | http://ynada.com | http://twitter.com/coffee001
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Germany
(CC BY-SA 3.0 DE)
- re:connecting EUROPE re:cap Video 2017 - 18.10.2017
- re:connecting Europe 2017 – Ramak Molavi: Ultimate Platform Power: a situation in need of change - 10.10.2017
- re:connecting Europe 2017 – Anna Alberts: Re:connecting Europe: following money flows - 10.10.2017
- re:connecting Europe 2017 – Digital News/Media Coops: A Better Future? - 09.10.2017
- re:connecting Europe 2017 – Jan-Philipp Martini: Avoid the digital trap. Try Mindfulness. - 09.10.2017